1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 338 N.W.2d
  5. 338 N.W.2d 437 (1983)
 

DALCO CORP. v. DIXON

No. C1-82-1520.

338 N.W.2d 437 (1983)

DALCO CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Maurice DIXON and Brissman-Kennedy, Inc., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 23, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome S. Rice Law Offices, Minneapolis, for appellant.

O'Neill, Burke & O'Neill, St. Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellant, Dalco Corporation (Dalco), instituted this action against a former employee, respondent Maurice Dixon, and against Dixon's subsequent employer, respondent Brissman-Kennedy, Inc. (B-K), alleging that Dixon breached a non-compete employment agreement; that both respondents are unfairly competing with Dalco; that B-K has tortiously interfered with Dalco's employment contract with Dixon and other contractual rights; and that as a result of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases