PARTLOW v. CLARK

No. TC 16-81-06494, CA A23332, SC 29157.

671 P.2d 103 (1983)

295 Or. 778

Phyllis Lee PARTLOW, Formerly Phyllis Lee Rembert, Respondent On Review, v. Chester C. CLARK and Mary L. Clark, Husband and Wife, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 25, 1983.

Rehearing Denied December 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K. Patrick Neill, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners. With him on the brief were Hershner, Hunter, Miller, Moulton & Andrews, and Paul V. Vaughan, Eugene.

Claud A. Ingram, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.


CAMPBELL, Justice.

The issue in this case: Is an owner's interest in real property under a dissolution decree issued by a court of the county in which the land is located, but not recorded in the deed records of that county, void as to a subsequent purchaser for value who has not received actual notice? To say it differently — is it necessary to record a dissolution decree in the deed records as authorized by Oregon statutes to give constructive notice of it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases