The documentary evidence is at least consistent with the view that the original purchase agreement was superseded by the later loan agreement, so that instead of an absolute contract of purchase and sale, there was a loan from plaintiffs to defendant-appellant Karp with an option, but only an option, in the defendant to deliver the stock and proprietary lease to plaintiffs in satisfaction of the loan...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
