1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 60 N.Y.2d
  5. 60 N.Y.2d 693 (1983)
 

FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.

60 N.Y.2d 693 (1983)

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant, v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Hart, Robert Beau Leonard, Steven Gutman and Jan P. Ryan for appellant.

Edward J. Ross for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur in memorandum.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative.

Whether Special Term's vacatur of defendant's default in answering was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law is a question of law reviewable by certified question (Barasch v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases