1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 145 Cal.App.3d
  5. 145 Cal.App.3d 599 (1983)
 

IN RE MARRIAGE OF FORCUM

Docket No. 52028.

145 Cal.App.3d 599 (1983)

193 Cal. Rptr. 596

In re the Marriage of LILLIAN R. and CHARLES D. FORCUM. CHARLES D. FORCUM, Appellant, v. LILLIAN R. FORCUM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

July 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Hanley, Herman J. Mager and Keough, Cali & Hanley for Appellant.

Gardner F. Holmes and Dale C. Mead for Respondent.

OPINION

KING, J.

In this case we hold that where the general provisions of a marital settlement agreement (incorporated by reference into the interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage) do not permit future judicial modification, but the agreement also contains a specific provision on spousal support the legal effect of which is to retain the jurisdiction of the court to modify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases