WOLD v. MINERALS ENGINEERING CO.

Civ. A. Nos. 83-C-1068, 83-C-1096.

575 F.Supp. 166 (1983)

John S. WOLD, Plaintiff, v. MINERALS ENGINEERING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MINERALS ENGINEERING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. John S. WOLD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

November 15, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fishman, Gersh & Bursiek, P.C., Denver, Colo., for Minerals Engineering Co.

Donald C. McKinley, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Denver, Colo., for John S. Wold.


ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on (1) the Motion of plaintiff Minerals Engineering Company ("MECO"), filed by its attorneys Fishman, Gersh & Bursiek, P.C., September 12, 1983, to disqualify the law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt from representing John S. Wold in the captioned cases, and (2) Wold's request for the imposition of sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases