BRANCHBURG BD. OF ED. v. BRANCHBURG


187 N.J. Super. 540 (1983)

455 A.2d 549

BOARD OF EDUCATION, TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG, SOMERSET COUNTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BRANCHBURG, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 18, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Anderson argued the cause for appellant (Woolson, Guterl, Sutphen & Anderson, attorneys).

William B. Rosenberg argued the cause for respondent (Blumberg & Rosenberg, attorneys).

No appearance was made on behalf of the State Board of Education (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for State Board of Education; Regina Murray Mahoney, Deputy Attorney General, on statement in lieu of brief).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, J.H. COLEMAN and GAULKIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.

The chief issue presented by this appeal is whether a township committee, in its review of the proposed budget of a board of education after rejection of the budget by the electorate, may reach and consider items of income anticipated by the board. We hold that it may.

On April 7, 1981 the electorate of the Township of Branchburg rejected the school budget proposed by the township board of education...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases