Appellant landlord contended that petitioner had violated the terms of a lease dated May 8, 1981 by using the premises for residential or joint living-working quarters, and accordingly the landlord served a "notice to cure" in September, 1982. The tenant brought this declaratory judgment action to declare that he had not violated a substantial obligation of his lease, that the subject premises are an interim multiple dwelling under article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
