UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
David Keith HENSEL, Defendant, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Gerald Wayne CASE, Larry Ronald Duke, Robert Curtis Hubbard, Charles Thad Standley and John Jacob Wells, Defendants, Appellants.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Creig Lee DILL, Defendant, Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 5, 1982.
Decided January 25, 1983.
Rehearing and Rehearing Denied February 28, 1983.
Rehearing and Rehearing Denied March 9, 1983.
Certiorari Denied May 31, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael Avery, Boston, Mass., with whom John P. Ward, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellant David Keith Hensel.
Edward T.M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga., with whom Steven H. Sadow, and Garland, Nuckolls & Catts, P.C., Atlanta, Ga., were on brief, for appellants Larry Ronald Duke and Robert Curtis Hubbard.
David C. Pomeroy, Portland, Me., with whom Wheeler, Pomeroy & Snitger, Portland, Me., was on brief, for appellant Charles Thad Standley.
Bruce H. Morris, Atlanta, Ga., with whom Devine & Morris and Melvin Gutterman, Atlanta, Ga., were on brief, for appellant Gerald Wayne Case.
Mark J. Kadish, Atlanta, Ga., with whom Rosalyn S. Kadish, and Kadish, Davis & Brofman, P.C., Atlanta, Ga., were on brief, for appellant John Jacob Wells.
Joseph Beeler, Miami, Fla., with whom Barbara Green, Miami, Fla., was on brief, for appellant Creig Lee Dill.
Margaret D. McGaughey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Me., with whom Richard S. Cohen, U.S. Atty., Portland, Me., was on brief, for appellee.
Before TIMBERS, Senior Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL and BREYER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 81-1538 February 28, 1983.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in Nos. 81-1539 and 81-1540 March 9, 1983.
Certiorari Denied May 31, 1983. See 103 S.Ct. 2431.
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
We here consider appeals from several defendants convicted by jury trial of participating in a conspiracy to import and distribute marijuana. Rather than write separate opinions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
