1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. 623 (1983)
 

IN RE O'GRADY

92 N.J. 623 (1983)

458 A.2d 1285

IN THE MATTER OF HAROLD V. O'GRADY, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 5, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Rubenstein argued the cause for the District V Ethics Committee.

George M. Kachmar III argued the cause for the respondent.

ORDER OF PUBLIC REPRIMAND

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that HAROLD V. O'GRADY of JERSEY CITY be publicly reprimanded for his improper removal of files of his former employer in violation of DR. 1-102(A)(3), (4) and (6) and for his failure to apportion fees in accordance with his fee agreement with that employer in violation of DR. 1-102(A)(4), and the Court having reviewed the record,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases