VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in admitting evidence and making findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the CP & L easement. They contend that this Court had previously ruled on this issue in Waters II and the trial court was bound by that decision under the doctrine of law of the case.
In general, when an appellate court decides a question and remands the case for further proceedings, the questions determined...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
