WARD v. DAVIDOWITZ


191 N.J. Super. 518 (1983)

468 A.2d 250

MAUREEN WARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BETTY DAVIDOWITZ AND NADINE Z. DAVIDOWITZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis M. Donnelly argued the cause for appellant (Blume, Vazquez, Goldfaden, Kuhn & Berkowitz, attorneys).

Michael D. Kirby argued the cause for respondents (Campbell, Foley, Lee, Murphy & Cernigliaro, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.

Hornyak v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 63 N.J. 99 (1973) and Wyatt v. Metropolitan Maintenance Co., 74 N.J. 167 (1977) stand for the proposition that injuries sustained by employees on a lunch break, while away from the employer's premises to obtain food not available on the premises are compensable under the Workers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases