TOMLINSON v. CITY OF CINCINNATI

No. 82-219.

4 Ohio St. 3d 66 (1983)

TOMLINSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Miller & Whiteley and Mr. Daniel Whiteley, Jr., for appellee.

Mr. Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, and Mr. Daniel J. Schlueter, for appellant.


PATTON, J.

The first question presented for our determination is whether the court of appeals properly considered the affidavit of Angela Charron. Appellant argues that the court erred in relying upon this affidavit to reverse the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment because it contains only the opinions of the affiant, which appellant argues are inadmissible in evidence.1 We disagree for the reasons set forth below.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases