STATE v. PRATT

No. 8214SC873.

301 S.E.2d 403 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. James Earl PRATT.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard H. Carlton, Raleigh, for the State.

Lipton & Mills by William S. Mills, Durham, for defendant-appellant.


ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial due to the admission of testimony, over defendant's objection, by the State's witness Linda Currie that defendant told her that he had robbed a Fast Fare convenience store in Hillsborough by himself two or three weeks before the armed robbery which is the subject of the present case. We agree for the following reasons.

In North Carolina, evidence of other crimes is not admissible when its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases