1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 190 Conn.
  5. 190 Conn. 510 (1983)
 

HESLIN v. CONNECTICUT LAW CLINIC OF TRANTOLO & TRANTOLO

(10892)

190 Conn. 510 (1983)

MARY M. HESLIN, COMMISSIONER OF CONSUMER PROTECTION v. CONNECTICUT LAW CLINIC OF TRANTOLO AND TRANTOLO

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released June 28, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Ormstedt, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Joseph I. Lieberman, attorney general, and Robert M. Langer, assistant attorney general, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Maxwell Heiman, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Tracy, Jr., for the appellee (defendant).

PETERS, PARSKEY, SHEA, SPONZO and SPADA, JS.

PETERS, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether an investigative demand of Mary M. Heslin, the Connecticut Commissioner of Consumer Protection (commissioner), issued to attorneys suspected of engaging in deceptive trade practices, exceeds the commissioner's statutory authority and unlawfully exercises a power vested by the constitution of Connecticut exclusively with the state judiciary. The case arose when the defendant, Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases