BATES MARKETING ASSOCS. v. LLOYD'S ELECTRONICS


190 N.J. Super. 502 (1983)

464 A.2d 1142

BATES MARKETING ASSOCIATES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND TOY ADVISORY GUILD, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LLOYD'S ELECTRONICS, INC. AND LLOYD'S OF CALIFORNIA, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward D. Bortz argued the cause for the appellants (Hein, Smith & Berezin, attorneys; Robert T. Quinn and Edward D. Bortz on the brief).

Frederick L. Whitmer argued the cause for the respondents (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; James H. Foster, James L. Nulman, Lawrence H. Jacobs, Katherine S. Abrams, Peter M. Laughlin and Frederick L. Whitmer on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

The primary issue raised by this appeal is the applicability to this cause of action of the entire controversy doctrine. The trial judge, concluding that that preclusionary doctrine was here applicable, dismissed the action with prejudice. We reverse.

Plaintiffs Bates Marketing Associates, Inc. (Bates), a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in New York, and Toy Advisory Guild...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases