A. C. HOYLE CO. v. SPERRY RAND CORP.

Docket No. 64037.

128 Mich. App. 557 (1983)

340 N.W.2d 326

A. C. HOYLE COMPANY v. SPERRY RAND CORPORATION

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Petrucelli & Petrucelli (by Vincent R. Petrucelli), for plaintiff.

Bodman, Longley & Dahling (by Walter O. Koch and Thomas Van Dusen), for defendant.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and WAHLS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, A.C. Hoyle Company, appeals as of right from an April 13, 1982, order of partial summary judgment against it pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

In its complaint plaintiff alleged that it had entered into a contract with Bethlehem Steel Corporation to supply deck machinery for four oceanfaring oil tankers which Bethlehem was building. The machinery to be supplied by plaintiff was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases