STATE v. BERRY

No. 508A82.

298 S.E.2d 386 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. Rudolph BERRY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 11, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Reginald L. Watkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Adam Stein, Appellate Defender by James H. Gold, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.


PER CURIAM.

The principal question on this appeal is whether defendant's fingerprints found at the scene of the crime provided sufficient evidence of defendant's guilt for the case to be submitted to the jury. The Court of Appeals, after fully and accurately giving the facts and after a full and sufficient consideration of appropriate precedents, concluded that the evidence was sufficient. For the reasons given in the Court of Appeals' opinion, its decision is

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases