ANDERJESKI v. CITY COURT OF CITY OF MESA

Nos. 16376-SA, 16403-SA.

135 Ariz. 549 (1983)

663 P.2d 233

James ANDERJESKI, Daniel Anderson, James Anderson, Ronald Bahr, Michael Campos, Robert Claycomb, Michael Curley, Virgil Dillon, Anton Jukic, Margaret Kelson, John Lawson, Russell Miller, Rudolpho Navarro, Michael Rux, Robert Smith, Ben Tresise, Marcus Ventrella, Chris Benjamin, Jerry Blanton, Tim Bowler, Loretta Cecil, Gerald Chumack, Edward Foote, Greg Lawson, John MacIsaac, Doug Purdom, Larry Torres, Scott Cohea, Pete Fernandez, Gary Hobbs, Ruben Torres, Antonio Hernandez, Donald Lawrence, Steven Blakemore, Robert Carlisle, J.Y. Mills, Kenneth Johnson, August Root, Shirley Kennedy, Nancy Wharton, Richard Beck, Petitioners, v. CITY COURT OF the CITY OF MESA, State of Arizona, City of Mesa, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and the Mesa City Prosecutor's Office, an agent thereof, Hon. Harold Reeb, Hon. D.H. Standage, and Hon. Norval Jesperson, real parties in interest, and Hon. David G. Derickson, Judge of Superior Court, Respondents. Janet C. WHEELER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Arizona, the City Court of the City of Mesa, Arizona, ex rel Lowell D. Hamilton, Mesa City Prosecutor, and the Honorable Harold H. Reeb, City Magistrate of the City Court, Real Party in Interest, and the Honorable David Derickson, Judge of the Superior Court, Maricopa County Arizona, Real Party in Interest, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

May 2, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Wiltbank, P.C. by Ronald Wiltbank, Charles C. Schock, Phoenix, for petitioners in No. 16376-SA.

Lowell D. Hamilton, Mesa City Prosecutor, Mesa, for respondents.

Andy Baumert, Phoenix City Atty. by Paul Ahler, City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office, Thomas E. Collins, Maricopa County Atty. by Jerry G. Landau, Phoenix, for brief amicus curiae.

Thomas M. Shaw, Mesa, for petitioner in No. 16403-SA.


CAMERON, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction of two petitions for special action pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6 § 5(1) and Arizona Rules for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer two questions on appeal:

1. May a defendant be convicted of both a violation of A.R.S. § 28-692(A) and (B) for conduct arising from a single incident? 2. If so, may defendant be punished separately for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases