IN RE VINCENTI


92 N.J. 591 (1983)

458 A.2d 1268

IN THE MATTER OF LESTER T. VINCENTI, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 27, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Staff Attorney, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, attorney).

Michael A. Cohan and Lester T. Vincenti, pro se, argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Under some circumstances it might be difficult to determine precisely the point at which forceful, aggressive trial advocacy crosses the line into the forbidden territory of an ethical violation. But no matter where in the spectrum of courtroom behavior we would draw that line, no matter how indulgent our view of acceptable professional conduct might be, it is inconceivable that the instances of respondent's demeanor that we are called upon to review in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases