SHULMAN, Chief Judge.
Appellant and a codefendant, her son, were convicted of possession and sale of marijuana and cocaine. The codefendant's conviction was affirmed in Pitts v. State,
1. In her first two enumerations of error, appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict or to submit the case to the jury on theories of conspiracy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
