1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 96 A.D.2d
  5. 96 A.D.2d 580 (1983)
 

MAURICE B. CUNNINGHAM, INC. v. DENCKLA

96 A.D.2d 580 (1983)

Maurice B. Cunningham, Inc., Appellant, v. Katherine N. Denckla, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 25, 1983

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

There was no meeting of the minds between the defendant (seller) and the prospective purchaser with respect to all the essential contract terms (i.e., defendant never agreed to the additional terms proposed by the prospective purchaser). Therefore, no agreement was reached and the plaintiff broker is not entitled to a brokerage commission (see Kaelin v Warner, 27 N.Y.2d 352; Arnold v Schmeidler...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases