MAKUCH v. SAIF

No. 81-04519; CA A26149.

667 P.2d 7 (1983)

64 Or.App. 178

In the matter of the Compensation of Ida M. MAKUCH, Claimant. Ida M. Makuch, Petitioner, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rick Roll, Tillamook, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Todd Westmoreland, and Roll & Westmoreland, Tillamook.

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case claimant appeals an order of the Workers' Compensation Board upholding SAIF's denial of payments for chiropractic treatment. We agree with the Board's analysis of the evidence and affirm.

Affirmed.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge, dissenting.

The issue is whether SAIF must pay for claimant's chiropractic treatments. I would agree with the referee and with dissenting Board member Lewis that claimant has sustained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases