1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 93 N.J.
  5. 93 N.J. 569 (1983)
 

BOYLE v. BREME

93 N.J. 569 (1983)

461 A.2d 1164

ALBERTA BOYLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES J. BREME, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 14, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Asbell argued the cause for appellant (Joseph Asbell, attorney; Yale I. Asbell, on the briefs).

John R. Gercke, Asst. County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Steven D. Weinstein, Camden County Counsel, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Fritz in his opinion below. 187 N.J.Super. 129 (App.Div. 1982). We note that when the Legislature added a provision for co-employee immunity to the Workers' Compensation Act in 1961, L. 1961, c. 2 (codified at N.J.S.A. 34:15-8), some employers had medical clinics staffed by employee doctors and nurses. If the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases