THE HOWARD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL.
v.
THE CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COLUMBIA CONCEPT ET AL.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided August 10, 1983.
Motions For Reconsideration denied October 21, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Roger D. Redden, with whom were James D. Lano and Paul A. Tiburzi on the brief, for appellant The Howard Research and Development Corporation and by Paul T. Johnson, Assistant County Solicitor, with whom was Timothy E. Welsh, County Solicitor, on the brief, for appellant Howard County, Maryland.
Barbara Gold for appellees.
Amicus curiae brief of Prince George's County, Maryland filed. Robert B. Ostrom, County Attorney, Michael O. Connaughton, Deputy County Attorney and Steven M. Gilbert, Associate County Attorney, on the brief.
The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODOWSKY, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
DAVIDSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case presents the question whether the Howard County Board of Appeals (Board of Appeals) has authority to entertain an appeal from an action of the Howard County Planning Board (Planning Board) approving the construction of a gasoline service station (gas station) in the Columbia New Town District (Columbia).1 The relevant statutory, charter...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
