1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 558 F.Supp.
  5. 558 F.Supp. 83 (1983)
 

ESTEE LAUDER, INC. v. HARCO GRAPHICS, INC.

No. 82 Civ. 2354(MP).

558 F.Supp. 83 (1983)

ESTEE LAUDER, INC., Aramis, Inc., and Clinique Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HARCO GRAPHICS, INC., Harry Aronson, and Spencer Press, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 18, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hendler & Murray by Michael Maillet, New York City, Virginia LoPreto, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs.

Satterlee & Stephens by James F. Rittinger, Geoffrey H. Ward, Gregory J. Barnes, New York City, for defendant Spencer.

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.

Defendant Spencer Press has moved the Court to dismiss plaintiff's claim pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6), 9(b) and/or 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because defendant's motion was supported by materials that are outside the scope of the pleadings, the Court informed the parties on January 18, 1983, that the motion would be treated as one for summary judgment as provided for in Rule 56, Fed.R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases