SHULMAN, Chief Judge.
Appellant was found guilty of selling marijuana to an undercover investigator. In his sole enumeration of error, appellant takes issue with the trial court's failure to instruct the jury that the defendant could not be convicted of the sale of marijuana if he were acting solely as a procuring agent for another.
Appellant's contention is controlled adversely to him by this court's decisions in Bailey v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.