Defendant has requested reconsideration of the court's decision of July 15, 1983, denying her motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30 and 30.20. She has submitted a memorandum of law in support of that request.
Her position is twofold. First, she argues that delay resulting from the scheduling and conduct of a preliminary hearing is not an excludable period of delay. That is, she contends, a preliminary hearing is not "[another...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.