1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 583 F.Supp.
  5. 583 F.Supp. 31 (1983)
 

TEKLINSKY v. OTTAWA SILICA CORP.

Civ. No. 82-71775.

583 F.Supp. 31 (1983)

Joseph TEKLINSKY, Plaintiff, v. OTTAWA SILICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Celotex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and successor to Phillip Carey Corporation, and Pennwalt Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Jointly and Severally, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

October 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darlene Domanik, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff.

Delmer C. Gowing, III, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for defendants.

OPINION

THORNTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Pennwalt Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that plaintiff's claim is barred by the exclusivity provision of the Michigan Workers Disability Compensation Act, M.C.L. § 418.131; M.S.A. § 17.237(131).

The plaintiff was employed by Pennwalt Corporation for approximately thirty years, until 1979, when he was determined to be permanently disabled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases