1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 559 F.Supp.
  5. 559 F.Supp. 52 (1983)
 

TEDONE v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. H-83-48.

559 F.Supp. 52 (1983)

Damian TEDONE and Nicholas Guidice v. UNITED STATES of America.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 23, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Merberg, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Richard N. Palmer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY AND SUPPRESSION OF ITS USE AS EVIDENCE IN ANY PROCEEDING

BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.

Petitioners Tedone and Guidice have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) that certain papers seized from them be returned,1 and that these papers not be admissible in evidence at any hearing or trial. According to Rule 41(e), petitioners are entitled to such relief if the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases