THIEF RIVER FALLS v. UNITED FIRE & CAS. CO.

No. C9-82-1359.

336 N.W.2d 274 (1983)

CITY OF THIEF RIVER FALLS, Respondent, v. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied August 19, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charlson & Marben and Kurt J. Marben, Thief River Falls, for appellant.

Wurst, McDowell & Ihle and Robert A. Wurst, Thief River Falls, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


SCOTT, Justice.

Defendant United Fire & Casualty Company (United) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff City of Thief River Falls (City) in this suit for damages due to failure to defend pursuant to the terms of an insurance policy. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether an action for a writ of mandamus is one "seeking damages" within the meaning of the contract language. We are persuaded that it clearly and unambiguously is not and, therefore, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases