Defendant was convicted before me and a jury of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40).
Defendant moves to set the verdict aside on the grounds that the count in the accusatory instrument charging him with the crime was duplicitous, citing People v Rosado (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.