Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Plaintiffs claim that their motion was in fact a motion to renew. However, they concede that there were no new or additional facts presented in their moving papers since the record before Special Term on the prior motion contained their "additional facts". Therefore, the motion was in fact a motion to reargue and no appeal lies from the denial of such a motion (see Klatz v Armor Elevator Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.