1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 578 F.Supp.
  5. 578 F.Supp. 11 (1983)
 

ZELASKOWSKI v. JOHNS-MANVILLE, CORP.

Civ. A. No. 82-2069.

578 F.Supp. 11 (1983)

Ruth Ida ZELASKOWSKI, etc., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE, CORP., et al.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse Moskowitz, Jersey City, N.J., for plaintiff.

Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Coyle, Wulster & Griggs, Hackensack, N.J., for defendant Owens Corning.

McCarter & English, Newark, N.J., for defendant Owens Illinois.

Wolff & Samson, West Orange, N.J., for defendant Turner & Newall.

Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, New Brunswick, N.J., for defendant Glen Aldon.

Horuvitz, Perlow & Morris, Bridgeton, N.J., for defendant Wicolet Ind.

Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, Roseland, N.J., for defendant Keene Corp.

Lamb, Hutchinson, Chappell, Ryan & Hartung, Jersey City, N.J., for defendant Philip Carey.

Haskins, Robottom, Hack, Prio & O'Day, West Orange, N.J., for defendant Combustion Engineer.

DeSevo, Cerutti & Lombardi, Jersey City, N.J., for defendant Penn Valley.

Connell, Foley & Geiser, Newark, N.J., for defendant H.K. Porter.

Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, Mount Holly, N.J., for defendant Forty Eight Insul.

Joseph L. Garrubbo, Westfield, N.J., for defendant Garlock.

Enright, Porter & Lenney, Bloomfield, N.J., for defendant Pacor.

Steedle, Megargee, Youngblood, Franklin & Corcoran, Pleasantville, N.J., for defendant Armstrong Cork.

Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan & Spielvogel, Livingston, N.J., for defendant Raymark Ind.

Graham & Winter, Edison, N.J., for defendant Fibreboard.

Sellar, Richardson & Stuart, Newark, N.J., for defendant John Crane.

Carton, Nary, Witt, Asbury Park, N.J., for defendant Flintkote Co.

Philip Lago, Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, Newark, N.J., for defendant GAF.

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

In this personal injury action, plaintiff seeks to impose liability on numerous manufacturers and distributors of asbestos for injuries sustained by her decedent as a result of his exposure to asbestos during the course of his employment as a marine machinist at the New York and Philadelphia Naval Shipyards. Plaintiff asserts both diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and federal question jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases