STATE v. PATE

No. 8220SC888.

302 S.E.2d 286 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. Ralph PATE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. William F. Briley, Raleigh, for the State.

Haynes, Baucom, Chandler, Claytor & Benton by W.J. Chandler, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.


EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant has assigned error to several evidentiary rulings. He argues that the trial judge erred in excluding evidence pertaining to prior confrontations between the Pates and the Flowes. Since defendant has failed to include in the record what the witnesses would have testified to in this regard, we are precluded from any review on appeal. State v. Misenheimer, 304 N.C. 108, 282 S.E.2d 791 (1981). For the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases