1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 335 N.W.2d
  5. 335 N.W.2d 236 (1983)
 

CROUSE v. STATE

No. C3-81-486.

335 N.W.2d 236 (1983)

Ray CROUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 24, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Scott, Pipestone, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Atty. Gen., Richard D. Hodsdon and Jerry S. Anderson, Sp. Asst., St. Paul, Pete Kasal, County Atty., Glencoe, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for postconviction relief in the form of a new trial. The petition alleged that petitioner's trial attorney had a conflict of interest with petitioner and that that conflict led him to refuse to let petitioner testify in his own behalf. The issue in this appeal is not whether there are grounds to discipline petitioner's trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases