CLINT EASTWOOD, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 1, 1983.
December 1, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Gang, Tyre & Brown, Robin Russell and Howard King for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Williams & Connolly, Irving Younger, Richard M. Cooper, F. Lane Heard III, Irell & Manella, Richard H. Borow and Jonathan H. Steinberg for Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.
OPINION
THOMPSON, J.
(1) (See fn. 1.) In this proceeding in mandate,1 we inquire into the propriety of the respondent court's ruling sustaining without leave to amend the general demurrer of the real party in interest, National Enquirer, Inc. (Enquirer), to the second cause of action of the complaint of petitioner, Clint Eastwood (Eastwood), for commercial appropriation of the right of publicity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.