DOT v. GRAMAR CONS. CO.

No. 1629 C.D. 1981.

71 Pa.Commw. 481 (1983)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Petitioner v. Gramar Construction Company, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 31, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carleton O. Strouss, Assistant Counsel, with him Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, and Jay C. Waldman, General Counsel, for petitioner.

Charles R. Volk, with him Martin J. Saunders, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, for respondent.

Argued November 18, 1982, before Judges ROGERS, MacPHAIL and DOYLE, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MacPHAIL, January 31, 1983:

The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) has appealed from an order of the Board of Claims (Board) directing DOT to pay the sum of $19,400.53 together with interest to Gramar Construction Co. (Gramar).

At issue here is the interpretation of a portion of a maintenance contract entered into between DOT and Gramar in 1977 for the cleaning of certain roadway slopes, slope benches, drop areas and shoulders...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases