1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 92 A.D.2d
  5. 92 A.D.2d 456 (1983)
 

FITZGERALD v. PATZ CO.

92 A.D.2d 456 (1983)

Robert Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Patz Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 1, 1983

The issue on appeal in this products liability action is whether there is a legally sufficient excuse for the manufacturer defendants' failure timely to answer the complaint, or whether the delay was caused by inexcusable law office failure under the rule of Barasch v Micucci (49 N.Y.2d 594), and Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S. (56 N.Y.2d 900). We hold that there was a legally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases