1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 299 S.E.2d
  5. 299 S.E.2d 242 (1983)
 

STATE v. SAMUEL

No. 8221SC503.

299 S.E.2d 242 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. James Bernard SAMUEL.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 18, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., David S. Crump, Raleigh, for the State.

Liner & Bynum by David V. Liner and Zachary T. Bynum, III, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

BECTON, Judge.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred when it allowed the district attorney to lead Wardell Williams, a witness for the State, and elicit testimony concerning the legal significance of an insurance release form. It is so well-known as to be axiomatic that the trial court has discretionary authority to permit leading questions in proper instances. State v. Smith,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases