1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 94 A.D.2d
  5. 94 A.D.2d 434 (1983)
 

CURTIN v. GLAZIER

94 A.D.2d 434 (1983)

Thomas P. Curtin, Respondent, v. Louis J. Glazier et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Glazier, Jackler & Company, CPAs, Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 11, 1983

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bond, Schoeneck & King (George Lowe, John M. Freyer and Thomas R. Smith of counsel), for appellants.

Blitman & King (Michael J. Kawa of counsel), for respondent.

DILLON, P. J., DOERR, BOOMER and SCHNEPP, JJ., concur.

DENMAN, J.

This action arises out of dissolution of the partnership of Glazier, Jackler & Company, CPAs. The partnership was dissolved on May 10, 1982 pursuant to a "Dissolution Agreement" to which plaintiff, Thomas Curtin, was not a party, after which defendants formed two new partnerships from which Curtin was excluded. He now claims that he is entitled to compensation for his partnership interest under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases