1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 438 So.2d
  5. 438 So.2d 85 (1983)
 

BERNARD v. SCHNIER

Nos. 82-1265, 82-1886.

438 So.2d 85 (1983)

Martin BERNARD, Appellant, v. Charles SCHNIER, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford J. Beilly of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Mark Baer, Miami, and Thomas G. Sherman, Coral Gables, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This suit involves a suit on a note. The determinative question is whether the note was under seal. The trial court determined that it was not under seal and that the suit was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. There is little authority on the subject, but we conclude that the trial court was incorrect. The note was a sealed instrument. The summary judgment is reversed. See Megdell v. Bailey, 194 So.2d 13

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases