MEAD v. BLOOM


94 A.D.2d 423 (1983)

James J. Mead, Respondent, v. Karen E. Bloom et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 11, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miles, Cochrane, Grosse, Rossetti & Chelus, P. C. (Charles DiPasquale and Raymond T. Miles of counsel), for Karen E. Bloom and another, appellants.

Dixon & DeMarie, P. C. (Joseph DeMarie of counsel), for Hallman-Adkins Chevrolet, appellant.

Paul William Beltz, P. C. for respondent.

DILLON, P. J., HANCOCK, JR., DOERR and MOULE, JJ., concur.


BOOMER, J.

Where an employer, vicariously liable for the negligent act of his employee, settles with the injured party, any verdict against the employee will be reduced only by the amount of the settlement and not by the amount of the employer's "equitable share of the damages" as provided by section 15-108 of the General Obligations Law. This is so because "section 15-108 is meant to be read in conjunction with the contribution rights set forth in article...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases