DUGAN v. DUGAN


92 N.J. 423 (1983)

457 A.2d 1

JAMES P. DUGAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROSALEEN M. DUGAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Orr argued the cause for appellant (Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys).

James P. Yudes argued the cause for respondent.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

This case involves the equitable distribution of marital property upon divorce, more particularly the evaluation of an attorney's goodwill in his exclusively owned professional corporation.

Plaintiff, James P. Dugan, and defendant, Rosaleen M. Dugan, were married in 1958 and separated in 1978. They had no children. The plaintiff, a member of the New Jersey Bar, carries on his practice as a professional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases