1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 337 N.W.2d
  5. 337 N.W.2d 176 (1983)
 

TITZE v. MILLER

No. 14037.

337 N.W.2d 176 (1983)

Ruth TITZE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert E. MILLER, Defendant and Appellee.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided August 3, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald G. Schmidt of Schmidt, Schroyer, Colwill & Zinter, P.C., Pierre, for plaintiff and appellant (representing on appeal only).

Brent A. Wilbur of May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Pierre, for defendant and appellee.

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order dismissing plaintiff's action for loss of consortium. We affirm.

We are asked to decide whether an action for loss of consortium is subject to our three-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions, SDCL 15-2-14(3).* Correctly claiming that South Dakota cases identify interspousal consortium as a personal right, Hoekstra v. Helgeland, 78 S.D. 82,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases