1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 117 Ill.
  5. 117 Ill. App.3d 391 (1983)
 

COLE v. PEKIN INSURANCE CO.

No. 82-2444.

117 Ill. App.3d 391 (1983)

453 N.E.2d 876

GUY E. COLE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (4th Division).

Opinion filed August 25, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Levinson, of Michael D. Spinak & Associates, of Chicago, for appellants.

Pretzel & Stouffer, of Chicago (Robert Marc Chemers, of counsel), for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, Guy E. and Kerry Cole, appeal the dismissal of their complaint against defendant, Pekin Insurance Company, and raise the following issues for review: (1) whether the physical contact requirement is an impermissible limitation on the uninsured motorist statute and is contrary to legislative intent and public policy; (2) whether the term, "hit-and-run" implies a requirement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases