PEOPLE v. SURETY INS. CO.

Docket No. 7565.

148 Cal.App.3d 351 (1983)

195 Cal. Rptr. 876

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

October 26, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jesse J. Avila and E. Alan Nunez for Defendant and Appellant.

Floyd R.B. Viau, County Counsel, and Paul Edmond Stephan, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

WOOLPERT, J.

(1a) If a defendant misses a required appearance and appears later, after the court has ordered bail forfeited, can the judge effectively reinstate the bond and continue the defendant on the same bail without notice to the surety? Our answer is that it depends. On what? The timing.

If we seem to treat this appellate issue too lightly, in riddle form, we do so in the belief that the bail status...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases