IN RE DREIER


94 N.J. 396 (1983)

466 A.2d 561

IN THE MATTER OF HARRY DREIER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

September 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hyman Isaac argued the cause on behalf of the District XII Ethics Committee.

Martin Friedman argued the cause on behalf of the respondent.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that HARRY DREIER of PLAINFIELD be publicly reprimanded for intentionally misrepresenting the status of a case and for attempting to deceive his clients in violation of DR. 1-102(A)(4) and (6) and for failing to file a complaint in violation of DR. 7-101(A) and that he be required to reimburse the Administrative Office of the Courts for appropriate administrative costs, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases