SCHOENENBERGER ET UX. v. HAYMAN ET AL.

Nos. 55 T.D. 1981, 23 T.D. 1982 and 2375 C.D. 1982.

77 Pa.Commw. 411 (1983)

Saul Schoenenberger & Alice Schoenenberger, his wife v. Keith L. Hayman, Jr. et al. Appeal of Mifflin Township. Saul Schoenenberger & Alice Schoenenberger, his wife, Appellants v. Keith L. Hayman, Jr. et al., Appellees. Saul Schoenenberger and Alice Schoenenberger, his wife, Appellants v. Keith L. Hayman, Jr. et al., Appellees.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin E. Kepner, Jr., Kepner and Kepner, with him David C. Dickson, Jr., Beckley, Dickson and Hill, for appellant/appellee, Keith L. Hayman, Jr., Mifflin Township and Nathan Reigle.

Jack C. Younkin, for appellees/appellants, Saul Schoenenberger and Alice Schoenenberger, his wife.

Argued May 9, 1983, before Judges CRAIG, MacPHAIL and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE BARBIERI, October 7, 1983:

The present action involves the appeal of the additional defendant, Mifflin Township, and the cross-appeal of the plaintiffs, Saul and Alice Schoenenberger from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County which dismissed the exceptions filed by the parties to that court's finding of a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on their action for the breach of an implied warranty of habitability and fitness in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases