SECH v. ROGERS

No. 82-1506.

6 Ohio St. 3d 462 (1983)

SECH, EXECUTRIX, APPELLANT, v. ROGERS, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Butler, Cincione, DiCuccio & Dritz, Mr. N. Gerald DiCuccio, Mr. Stanley B. Dritz and Mr. David B. Barnhart, for appellant.

Messrs. Menapace & Sheppard, Mr. Alan Wayne Sheppard and Mr. David G. Bale, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

The first issue presented is whether the trial court's instruction to the jury, on the right of way, was erroneous. Appellant claims that the trial court's amended instruction to the jury, on the right of way, is an incorrect statement of the law because the definitions given of roadway and highway erroneously included the paved portion thereof, to the right of the white line. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree.

A jury instruction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases